hypercomics.net

How does our definition stack up to theirs?

July 22, 2008 · 3 Comments

Hypercomics on Wikipedia.

(It does have this interesting link to a great example of hypercomics according to their definition)

Categories: Uncategorized

3 responses so far ↓

  • grantthomas // July 22, 2008 at 9:27 am | Reply

    Its a shame that hypercomics.com doesn’t work. I was curious as to what that was.

  • nvonflue // July 22, 2008 at 10:13 am | Reply

    back when I got the .net domain, hypercomics.com was the portfolio of another artist. If I remember right he was using Alt text in his comic strips.
    Then it sat dormant for a long time and I assume he was finally bought out by a Co. who made a “build a your own webcomic” site. I wish it was still there too!

  • Fabricari // July 22, 2008 at 3:43 pm | Reply

    As it is Wiki, Neal, I think you could do well to update the definition. I’ve been thinking a lot about the simple yet loaded statement you made the other day that Hypercomics are comics that take advantages of the web medium that couldn’t necessarily be reproduced in print. Maybe I’m too close to web development on a daily basis, but I don’t have as much faith in what the web offers over the fundamental conventions of sequential art.

    I’m interested in panels that can overlap as layers, healthy gutters that you couldn’t afford to squander in print, blank spaces for rhythm, user interaction, garza-ian animations, media files, and of course hyperlinks. But all framed by the fundamental flow of vox bubbles and panels. This is, of course, a journey I have to take for myself to “get.”

Leave a Comment